Request For Comments On Draft Amendments to Rule G-27, on Supervision, That Strengthen Supervisory Procedures

Introduction

Over the past two years, a series of NASD and New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rule changes were put into effect that are designed to strengthen the supervisory control procedures of dealer firms.[1]  Specifically, NASD amended Rule 3010 (Supervision) to include more stringent office inspection rules, and added new Rule 3012 (Supervisory Control System), which requires the testing and verification of a firm’s supervisory procedures.

The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”) has approved releasing this notice seeking comment on draft amendments adopting substantially similar rule changes.  The MSRB believes that conforming its rule language to the language in the NASD rules will help ensure a coordinated regulatory approach in the area of supervision and facilitate inspection and enforcement.  The draft amendments are described more fully below.

Background

Rule G-27, on supervision, places an obligation on a dealer to supervise its municipal securities activities.  It requires a dealer to accomplish this objective by designating individuals with supervisory responsibilities for municipal securities activities, adopting written supervisory procedures, and reviewing transactions and correspondence.  Similarly, NASD Rule 3010 obligates a dealer to establish a supervisory system, requires written supervisory procedures and the review of transactions and correspondence, and most recently, requires internal inspections with minimum inspection cycles.

The NASD also recently adopted new Rule 3012, which requires dealers to do two things:  (1) a dealer must test and verify that its supervisory procedures are sufficient and amend or create additional supervisory procedures where the testing and verification identify a need; and (2) a dealer must have procedures that are reasonably designed to review and supervise on a day-to-day basis the customer account activity conducted by the dealer’s producing managers.

The MSRB believes that adopting most of the requirements of NASD Rules 3010 and 3012 promotes regulatory consistency while making these requirements specifically applicable to transactions in municipal securities by securities firms and bank dealers.  The following is a description of the draft amendments to Rule G-27.

Description of Draft Amendments

The draft amendments modify section (b) of Rule G-27, on supervisory system; add new section (c)(ii), on tape recording of conversations; add (c)(iii) on updating written supervisory procedures; add new section (d), on internal inspections; and add new section (f), on supervisory control system.

Supervisory System

The draft amendments modify section (b) of Rule G-27, on supervisory system, to include the following five provisions:[2]

•        Designation of certain locations as offices of supervisory jurisdiction (“OSJ”)[3] (G‑27(b)(iii));

•        Designation of one or more appropriately registered principals in each OSJ, including the main office, and one or more appropriately registered representatives or principals in each non-OSJ branch office with authority to carry out the supervisory responsibilities assigned to that office by the dealer (G‑27(b)(iv));

•        Assignment of each registered person to an appropriately registered representative or principal who shall be responsible for supervising that person’s activities (G‑27(b)(v));

•       Reasonable efforts to determine that all supervisory personnel are qualified by virtue of experience or training to carry out their assigned responsibilities (G‑27(b)(vi)); and

•       Participation of each registered representative and principal in an annual meeting to discuss compliance matters (G-27(b)(vii)).

The draft amendments also include a reference to “municipal fund securities limited principal” that is added to explicitly affirm the supervisory functions that such a principal may undertake pursuant to Rule G-3, on professional qualifications.  Specifically, subsection (b)(iv)(C) of Rule G-3 allows a municipal fund securities limited principal to “undertake all actions required or permitted under any Board rule to be taken by a municipal securities principal, but solely with respect to activities related to municipal fund securities.”

Tape Recording of Conversations

The draft amendments incorporate NASD Rule 3010(b)(2), on tape recording of conversations, in new provision G-27(c)(ii).  Section (c)(ii) requires dealers to establish special supervisory procedures, including the tape recording of conversations, when they have hired more than a specified percentage of registered persons from certain firms that have been expelled or have had their broker/dealer registrations revoked for violations of sales practice rules.[4]  The requisite percentage varies depending on the size of the dealer, from 40 percent for a small dealer to 20 percent for a larger dealer.  The dealer must establish the required supervisory procedures within 30 days of receiving notice from their registered securities association or bank regulator, or obtaining actual knowledge that it is subject to this provision of the rule.

Under this provision, if the requisite percentage of a dealer’s sales force previously was employed by a disciplined firm, the dealer will be required to adopt special written procedures to supervise the telemarketing activities of all its registered persons.  The procedures require, at a minimum, that the dealer tape records all telephone conversations between all of its registered persons and both existing and potential customers for a period of two years.  The measures required by this provision are designed to prevent a recurrence of sales practice abuse or other customer harm that caused the disciplined firm to have its registration revoked.

This provision also requires dealers subject to the taping requirement to establish reasonable procedures for reviewing tape recordings to ensure compliance with securities laws and applicable rules and regulations, to retain and catalog the tapes, and to submit reports to the appropriate registered securities association or bank regulator on their supervision of telemarketing.

Updating Written Supervisory Procedures

Subsection (c)(iii) is added to replace current section (e) which currently requires a dealer to revise and update its written supervisory procedures as necessary to respond to changes in Board or other applicable rules.  Draft subsection (c)(iii) has language that mirrors the language in NASD Rule 3010(b)(4), and requires each dealer to keep a copy of procedures at each location where supervisory activities are conducted and to amend its written supervisory procedures within a reasonable time after changes occur.  

Internal Inspections

The draft amendments incorporate NASD Rule 3010(c), on internal inspections, in new section G-27(d).   This new section imposes office inspection requirements that establish minimum inspection cycles and delineate the topics that must be covered during such inspections as well as the manner in which inspections are documented.[5]  In addition, the draft amendments include new section G-27(g) which defines the designations “office of supervisory jurisdiction” and “branch office” used in section (d), among other terms.

Mandatory Inspection Cycles.  Section (d) obligates dealers to inspect OSJs and supervisory branch offices[6] on at least an annual basis.  It also requires dealers to inspect all non-supervisory branch offices at least once every three years.  It directs dealers, however, to consider when it might be appropriate to conduct more frequent inspection of non-supervisory branch offices.  Further, G-27(d) requires dealers to inspect non-branch locations “on a regular periodic schedule.”  Each dealer must document, as part of its written supervisory procedures, an explanation of how the dealer determined the frequency of its examination schedule.  In establishing the schedule, dealers should consider the nature and complexity of the securities activities for which each non-branch location is responsible, and the frequency of customer contact at the non-branch location.

Independent Office Inspections. Section (d) places limits on who is eligible to perform the required inspection function.  This provision prohibits office inspections from being performed by:

• the branch office manager;
• any person within the office who has supervisory responsibilities; or
• any individual who is directly or indirectly supervised by such person(s).

However, an exception to this limitation is provided if the dealer is so limited in size and resources that it cannot comply with it.

Content of Inspections and Requirements for Inspection Reports.  Dealers must document each office inspection by preparing a written report that documents when it conducted the inspection and the results of its testing and verification in the following areas:

• Safeguarding customer funds and securities;
• Maintaining books and records;
• Supervising customer accounts services by branch office managers;
• Transmitting funds between customer and registered representative and between customers and third parties;
• Validating customer address changes; and
• Validating changes in customer account information.

Heightened Inspection Requirements.  Section (d) also requires dealers to adopt procedures that require heightened inspection if (1) the person conducting the inspection reports to the branch office manager’s supervisor or works in an office supervised by the branch manager’s supervisor; and (2) the branch office manager generates 20% or more of the revenue of the business units supervised by the branch office manager’s supervisor.  Dealers must calculate the 20% threshold in the same manner as when determining whether a producing manager must be subject to heightened supervision.  Examples of such “heightened” inspection procedure may include, without limitations, the following:

• unannounced office inspections;
• increasing the frequency of inspections;
• broadening the scope of activities inspected; and
• having one or more principals review or approve the inspection.

Supervisory Control System

The draft amendments also include a new section derived from NASD Rule 3012.  Section (f) of the draft amendments incorporates the following new requirements:

Testing and Verification of Supervisory Control Procedures. Section (f) requires dealers to designate and identify one or more principals charged with establishing, maintaining and enforcing a system of “supervisory control policies and procedures” that:

• test and verify that a dealer’s supervisory procedures are reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the federal securities laws and MSRB rules; and
• create additional or amended supervisory procedures where a need for such procedures is identified by such testing.

Annual Submission of Report to Senior Management. At least once annually, the principal(s) designated under section (f) must submit a report to senior management that details the dealer’s supervisory control policies and procedures, summarizes the results of testing and identifies significant weaknesses, and discusses additional or amended procedures implemented in response to such testing.

Supervision of Producing Manager’s Customer Account Activity. Section (f) requires dealers to adopt procedures to review and supervise daily customer account activities of each branch office manager, sales manager, regional or district sales manager, or any person performing similar supervisory functions (“producing managers”).  These policies and procedures must include “a means of customer confirmation, notification, or follow-up that can be documented.”  Specifically, the draft provision requires that policies and procedures must be reasonably designed to review and monitor the following activities:

• All transmittals of funds and securities to and from customer accounts;
• Changes of customer’s address, including procedures to validate change of address; and
• Changes in customer investment objectives, including validation of such changes.[7]

Independent Review of Producing Manager. Section (f) requires an independent review of the producing manager.  This review must be conducted by a person or persons who are senior to, or “otherwise independent” of, the producing manager.  To be considered “otherwise independent” of the producing manager, the person performing the review:

• must not report, either directly or indirectly, to the producing manager he or she is reviewing;
• must be located at a different office than the producing manager;
• must not have supervisory authority over any of the activity under review, including not being directly compensated in whole or in part as a result of such activity; and
• must alternate such review responsibility with another person at least once every two years.

Section (f) also requires enhanced supervision of producing managers who are responsible for generating at least 20% of the revenue of the business which is supervised by the producing manager’s supervisor.  Examples of “heightened” supervisory procedures may include the following:[8]

• unannounced supervisory reviews;
• increasing the frequency of supervisory reviews by different reviewers within a certain time period;
• broadening the scope of activities reviewed; and
• having one or more principals approve the supervisory review of such producing manager.

The heightened supervision requirement does not apply where an otherwise independent person conducts the producing manager’s reviews.

Finally, section (f) provides an exception from the independent review requirement if a dealer is so limited in size and resources that it is unable to identify anyone who is senior to or otherwise independent of the producing manager to conduct the review (“limited size and resource” exception).

* * * * *

The MSRB intends generally that the provisions of Rule G-27 be read consistently with the analogous NASD provisions, unless the MSRB specifically indicates otherwise.  Thus, relevant NASD interpretations would be presumed to apply to the comparable MSRB provision, subject to the MSRB’s right to make distinctions when necessary and appropriate. Furthermore, the MSRB intends to continue coordinating its requirements relating to supervision with those of the other relevant self-regulatory organizations in the securities markets.

Request for Comment

The MSRB seeks comments on all aspects of the draft amendments. Although NASD member firms have been subject to the requirements proposed in the draft amendments through the application of NASD Rules 3010 and 3012 to their securities activities, bank dealers have not been subject to these new requirements.  Thus, the MSRB is interested in receiving comments from bank dealers, particularly on their ability to comply with the tape recording of conversation requirements of section (c)(2), the new office inspection requirements of section (d), and the new supervisory control provisions in section (f) of the draft amendments.

* * * * *

Comments should be submitted no later than June 8, 2006, and may be directed to Ghassan Hitti, Assistant General Counsel.  Written comments will be available for public inspection.

April 21, 2006

* * * * *

Text of Draft Amendments[9]

Rule G-27. (a) Obligation to supervise. Each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer ("dealer") shall supervise the conduct of the municipal securities activities of the dealer and its associated persons to ensure compliance with Board rules and the applicable provisions of the Act and rules thereunder (“applicable rules”).

[(b) Designation of principals.

(i) General. Each dealer shall specifically designate one or more associated persons qualified as municipal securities principals, municipal securities sales principals, financial and operations principals in accordance with Board rules, or as general securities principals to be responsible for the supervision of the municipal securities activities of the dealer and its associated persons as required by this rule.

(ii) Written Record. A written record of each supervisory designation and of the designated principal's responsibilities under this rule shall be maintained and updated as required under rule G-9.

(iii) Appropriate principal. Each dealer shall designate a municipal securities principal as responsible for its supervision under sections (a) and (c) of this rule, except as provided in this section. A non-bank dealer shall designate a financial and operations principal as responsible for the financial reporting duties specified in rule G-3(d)(i)(A-E) and with primary responsibility for books and records under section (c)(v) below; provided, however, that a non-bank dealer meeting the requirements of Securities Exchange Act rule 15c3-1(a)(2)(iv), (v) or (vi) or the exemption under rule 15c3-1(b)(3) may, but is not required to, designate a financial and operations principal as responsible for such financial reporting duties and with primary responsibility for such books and records. In addition, a municipal securities sales principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under sections (c)(ii), (iii) and (vii) of this rule, to the extent the activities pertain to sales to or purchases from a customer; a general securities principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under sections (c)(v) and (vii)(A) of this rule and under rules G-7(b) and G-21(e); and a financial and operations principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under section (c)(vi) of this rule.]

(b) Supervisory System. Each dealer shall establish and maintain a system to supervise the municipal securities activities of each registered representative, registered principal, and other associated person that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, and with applicable Board rules.  Final responsibility for proper supervision shall rest with the dealer.  A dealer’s supervisory system shall provide, at a minimum, for the following:

(i) The establishment and maintenance of written procedures as required by sections (c), (d), (e) and (f) of this rule.

(ii) (A) General. The designation of one or more associated persons qualified as municipal securities principals, municipal securities sales principals, municipal fund securities limited principals, financial and operations principals in accordance with Board rules, or as general securities principals to be responsible for the supervision of the municipal securities activities of the dealer and its associated persons as required by this rule.

(B) Written Record. A written record of each supervisory designation and of the designated principal's responsibilities under this rule shall be maintained and updated as required under Rule G-9.

(C) Appropriate Principal. Each dealer shall designate a municipal securities principal as responsible for its supervision under sections (a) and (c) of this rule, except as provided in this section. A non-bank dealer shall designate a financial and operations principal as responsible for the financial reporting duties specified in Rule G-3(d)(i)(A-E) and with primary responsibility for books and records under section (c)(i)(E) below; provided, however, that a non-bank dealer meeting the requirements of Securities Exchange Act rule 15c3-1(a)(2)(iv), (v) or (vi) or the exemption under rule 15c3-1(b)(3) may, but is not required to, designate a financial and operations principal as responsible for such financial reporting duties and with primary responsibility for such books and records. In addition, a municipal securities sales principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under sections (c)(i)(B), (C) and (G) of this rule, to the extent the activities pertain to sales to or purchases from a customer; a general securities principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under sections (c)(i)(E) and (G)(1) of this rule and under Rules G-7(b) and G-21(e); and a financial and operations principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under section (c)(i)(F) of this rule. A municipal fund securities limited principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under sections (a) and (c) of this rule to the extent that the activities pertain solely to transactions in municipal fund securities.

(iii) The designation as an office of supervisory jurisdiction (OSJ) of each location that meets the definition contained in paragraph (g) of this rule.  Each dealer shall also designate such other OSJs as it determines to be necessary in order to supervise its registered representatives, registered principals, and other associated persons in accordance with the standards set forth in this rule, taking into consideration the following factors:

(A) whether registered persons at the location engage in retail sales or other activities  involving regular contact with public customers;

(B) whether a substantial number of registered persons conduct securities activities at, or  are otherwise supervised from, such location; (C) whether the location is geographically distant from another OSJ of the dealer;

(D) whether the dealer’s registered persons are geographically dispersed; and

(E)  whether the securities activities at such location are diverse and/or complex.

(iv) The designation of one or more appropriately registered principals in each OSJ, including the main office, and one or more appropriately registered representatives or principals in each non-OSJ branch office with authority to carry out the supervisory responsibilities assigned to that office by the dealer.

(v) The assignment of each registered person to an appropriately registered representative(s) and/or principal(s) who shall be responsible for supervising that person's activities.

(vi) Reasonable efforts to determine that all supervisory personnel are qualified by virtue of experience or training to carry out their assigned responsibilities.

(vii) The participation of each registered representative and registered principal, either individually or collectively, no less than annually, in an interview or meeting conducted by persons designated by the dealer at which compliance matters relevant to the activities of the representative(s) and principal(s) are discussed. Such interview or meeting may occur in conjunction with the discussion of other matters and may be conducted at a central or regional location or at the representative’s(’) or principal’s(’) place of business.

(c) Written supervisory procedures.

(i) Each dealer shall adopt, maintain and enforce written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the conduct of the municipal securities activities of the dealer and its associated persons are in compliance as required in section (a) of this rule. Such procedures shall codify the dealer’s supervisory system for ensuring compliance and, at a minimum, shall establish procedures

[(i)] (A) that state how a designated principal shall monitor for compliance by the dealer with all applicable rules and supervise the activities of associated persons specified in rule G-3(a)(i);

[(ii)] (B) a designated principal shall follow when a customer complaint concerning the dealer's municipal securities activities is received;

[(iii)] (C) for the regular and frequent review and approval by a designated principal of customer accounts introduced or carried by the dealer in which transactions in municipal securities are effected; such review shall be designed to ensure that such transactions are in accordance with all applicable rules and to detect and prevent irregularities and abuses;

[(iv)] (D) for the periodic review by a designated principal of each office which engages in municipal securities activities pursuant to section (d) of this rule;

[(v)] (E) for the maintenance and preservation, by a designated principal, of the books and records required to be maintained and preserved by rules G-8 and G-9 of the Board;

[(vi)] (F) for the supervision by a designated principal of the processing, clearance, and in the case of a non-bank dealer safekeeping of municipal securities; and

[(vii)] (G) for the prompt review and written approval by a designated principal of:

[(A)] (1) the opening of each customer account introduced or carried by the dealer in which transactions in municipal securities may be effected; and

[(B)] (2) each transaction in municipal securities on a daily basis, including each transaction in municipal securities effected with or for a discretionary account introduced or carried by the dealer.

(ii) Tape recording of conversations

(A) Each dealer that either is notified by the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer, or otherwise has actual knowledge that it meets one of the criteria in paragraph (c)(ii)(H) relating to the employment history of its registered persons at a disciplined firm as defined in paragraph (c)(ii)(J) shall establish, maintain, and enforce special written procedures for supervising the telemarketing activities of all of its registered persons.

(B) The dealer must establish and implement the supervisory procedures required by this paragraph within 60 days of receiving notice from the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer, or obtaining actual knowledge that it is subject to the provisions of this paragraph.

A dealer that meets one of the criteria in paragraph (c)(ii)(H) for the first time may reduce its staffing levels to fall below the threshold levels within 30 days after receiving notice from the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (c)(ii)(A) or obtaining actual knowledge that it is subject to the provisions of the paragraph, provided the dealer promptly notifies the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer, in writing of its becoming subject to the Rule. Once the dealer has reduced its staffing levels to fall below the threshold levels, it shall not rehire a person terminated to accomplish the staff reduction for a period of 180 days. On or prior to reducing staffing levels pursuant to this paragraph, a dealer must provide the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer, with written notice, identifying the terminated person(s).

(C) The procedures required by this paragraph shall include tape-recording all telephone conversations between the dealer's registered persons and both existing and potential customers.

(D) The dealer shall establish reasonable procedures for reviewing the tape recordings made pursuant to the requirements of this paragraph to ensure compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations and applicable rules. The procedures must be appropriate for the dealer's business, size, structure, and customers.

(E) All tape recordings made pursuant to the requirements of this paragraph shall be retained for a period of not less than three years from the date the tape was created, the first two years in an easily accessible place. Each dealer shall catalog the retained tapes by registered person and date.

(F) Such procedures shall be maintained for a period of three years from the date that the dealer establishes and implements the procedures required by the provisions of this paragraph.

(G) By the 30th day of the month following the end of each calendar quarter, each dealer subject to the requirements of this paragraph shall submit to the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer, a report on the dealer's supervision of the telemarketing activities of its registered persons.

(H) The following dealers shall be required to adopt special supervisory procedures over the telemarketing activities of their registered persons:

(1) A dealer with at least five but fewer than ten registered persons, where 40% or more of its registered persons have been associated with one or more disciplined firms in a registered capacity within the last three years;

(2) A dealer with at least ten but fewer than twenty registered persons, where four or more of its registered persons have been associated with one or more disciplined firms in a registered capacity within the last three years;

(3) A dealer with at least twenty registered persons, where 20% or more of its registered persons have been associated with one or more disciplined firms in a registered capacity within the last three years.

(4) For purposes of the calculations required in subparagraph (H), dealers should not include registered persons who:

(a) have been registered for an aggregate total of 90 days or less with one or more disciplined firms within the past three years; and

(b) do not have a disciplinary history.

(I) For purposes of this rule, the term "registered person" means any person registered pursuant to Rule G-3.

(J) For purposes of this rule, the term "disciplined firm" means either a dealer that, in connection with sales practices involving the offer, purchase, or sale of any security, has been expelled from membership or participation in any securities industry self-regulatory organization or is subject to an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission revoking its registration as a broker/dealer; or a futures commission merchant or introducing broker that has been formally charged by either the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or a registered futures association with deceptive telemarketing practices or promotional material relating to security futures, those charges have been resolved, and the futures commission merchant or introducing broker has been closed down and permanently barred from the futures industry as a result of those charges; or a futures commission merchant or introducing broker that, in connection with sales practices involving the offer, purchase, or sale of security futures is subject to an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission revoking its registration as a broker or dealer.

(K) For purposes of this rule, the term "disciplinary history" means a finding of a violation by a registered person in the past five years by the Securities and Exchange Commission, a self-regulatory organization, or a foreign financial regulatory authority of one or more of the following rules: Sections 15(b)(4)(E) and 15(c) of the Act; Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; SEC Rules 10b-5 and 15g-1 through 15g-9; NASD Rules 2110, 2120, 2310, 2330, 2440, 3010 (failure to supervise only), 3310, and 3330; MSRB Rules G-19, G-30, or G-37(b) or (c), or comparable foreign provisions.

(L) A registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer, upon application, may in exceptional circumstances, taking into consideration all relevant factors, exempt such dealer unconditionally or on specified terms and conditions from the requirements of this paragraph.  In the case of dealers that are NASD members, the NASD may exempt such dealer member unconditionally or on specified terms and conditions from the requirements of this paragraph pursuant to the NASD Rule 9600 Series.  A dealer seeking an exemption must file a written application within 30 days after receiving notice from the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer, or obtaining actual knowledge that it meets one of the criteria in paragraph (c)(ii)(H). A dealer that meets one of the criteria in paragraph (c)(ii)(H) for the first time may elect to reduce its staffing levels pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (c)(ii)(B) or, alternatively, to seek an exemption pursuant to paragraph (c)(ii)(L), as appropriate; such a dealer may not seek relief from the Rule by both reducing its staffing levels pursuant to paragraph (c)(ii)(B) and requesting an exemption.

(iii) A copy of a dealer’s written supervisory procedures, or the relevant portions thereof, shall be kept and maintained in each OSJ and at each location where supervisory activities are conducted on behalf of the dealer.  Each dealer shall amend its written supervisory procedures as appropriate within a reasonable time after changes occur in Board or other applicable rules and as changes occur in its supervisory system, and each dealer shall be responsible for communicating amendments through its organization.

(d) Internal Inspections

(i) Each dealer shall conduct a review, at least annually, of the municipal securities activities in which it engages, which review shall be reasonably designed to assist in detecting and preventing violations of, and achieving compliance with, applicable securities laws and regulations, and with applicable Board rules. Each dealer shall review the municipal securities activities of each office, which shall include the periodic examination of customer accounts to detect and prevent irregularities or abuses.

(A) Each dealer shall inspect at least annually every office of supervisory jurisdiction and any branch office that supervises one or more non-branch locations.

(B) Each dealer shall inspect at least every three years every branch office that does not supervise one or more non-branch locations. In establishing how often to inspect each non-supervisory branch office, the dealer shall consider whether the nature and complexity of the securities activities for which the location is responsible, the volume of business done, and the number of associated persons assigned to the location require the non-supervisory branch office to be inspected more frequently than every three years. If a dealer establishes a more frequent inspection cycle, the dealer must ensure that at least every three years, the inspection requirements enumerated in paragraph (d)(ii) have been met. The non-supervisory branch office examination cycle, an explanation of the factors the dealer used in determining the frequency of the examinations in the cycle, and the manner in which a dealer will comply with paragraph (d)(ii) if using more frequent inspections than every three years shall be set forth in the dealer’s written supervisory and inspection procedures.

(C) Each dealer shall inspect on a regular periodic schedule every non-branch location. In establishing such schedule, the dealer shall consider the nature and complexity of the securities activities for which the location is responsible and the nature and extent of contact with customers. The schedule and an explanation regarding how the dealer determined the frequency of the examination schedule shall be set forth in the dealer’s written supervisory and inspection procedures.

Each dealer shall retain a written record of the dates upon which each review and inspection is conducted.

(ii) An office inspection and review by a dealer pursuant to paragraph (d)(i) must be reduced to a written report and kept on file by the dealer for a minimum of three years, unless the inspection is being conducted pursuant to paragraph (d)(i)(C) and the regular periodic schedule is longer than a three-year cycle, in which case the report must be kept on file at least until the next inspection report has been written. The written inspection report must also include, without limitation, the testing and verification of the dealer’s policies and procedures, including supervisory policies and procedures in the following areas:

(A) Safeguarding of customer funds and securities;

(B) Maintaining books and records;

(C) Supervision of customer accounts serviced by branch office managers;

(D) Transmittal of funds between customers and registered representatives and between customers and third parties;

(E) Validation of customer address changes; and

(F) Validation of changes in customer account information.

If a dealer does not engage in all of the activities enumerated above, the dealer must identify those activities in which it does not engage in the written inspection report and document in the report that supervisory policies and procedures for such activities must be in place before the dealer can engage in them.

(iii) An office inspection by a dealer pursuant to paragraph (d)(i) may not be conducted by the branch office manager or any person within that office who has supervisory responsibilities or by any individual who is supervised by such person(s). However, if a dealer is so limited in size and resources that it cannot comply with this limitation (e.g., a dealer with only one office or a dealer has a business model where small or single-person offices report directly to an office of supervisory jurisdiction manager who is also considered the offices’ branch office manager), the dealer may have a principal who has the requisite knowledge to conduct an office inspection perform the inspections. The dealer, however, must document in the office inspection reports the factors it has relied upon in determining that it is so limited in size and resources that it has no other alternative than to comply in this manner.

A dealer must have in place procedures that are reasonably designed to provide heightened office inspections if the person conducting the inspection reports to the branch office manager’s supervisor or works in an office supervised by the branch manager’s supervisor and the branch office manager generates 20% or more of the revenue of the business units supervised by the branch office manager’s supervisor. For the purposes of this subsection only, the term "heightened inspection" shall mean those inspection procedures that are designed to avoid conflicts of interest that serve to undermine complete and effective inspection because of the economic, commercial, or financial interests that the branch manager’s supervisor holds in the associated persons and businesses being inspected. In addition, for the purpose of this section only, when calculating the 20% threshold, all of the revenue generated by or credited to the branch office or branch office manager shall be attributed as revenue generated by the business units supervised by the branch office manager’s supervisor irrespective of a dealer’s internal allocation of such revenue. A dealer must calculate the 20% threshold on a rolling, twelve-month basis.

 [(d)] (e)  Review of Correspondence

(i) Supervision of Municipal Securities Representatives. Each dealer shall establish procedures for the review by a designated principal of incoming and outgoing written ( i.e., non-electronic) and electronic correspondence of its municipal securities representatives with the public relating to the municipal securities activities of such dealer. Such procedures must be in writing and be designed to reasonably supervise each municipal securities representative. Evidence that these supervisory procedures have been implemented and carried out must be maintained and made available, upon request, to a registered securities association or the appropriate regulatory agency [as defined in section 3(a)(34) of the Act].

(ii) No Change.

(iii) Retention of correspondence.Each dealer shall retain correspondence of municipal securities representatives relating to its municipal securities activities in accordance with rules G-8(a)(xx) and G-9(b)(viii) and (xiv). The names of the persons who prepared outgoing correspondence and who reviewed the correspondence shall be ascertainable from the retained records and the retained records shall be readily available, upon request, to a registered securities association or the appropriate regulatory agency [as defined in Section 3(a)(34) of the Act].

[(e) Duty to update and review written procedures. Each dealer shall revise and update its written supervisory procedures as necessary to respond to changes in Board or other applicable rules and as other circumstances require. In addition, each dealer shall review, at least on an annual basis, its supervisory system and written supervisory procedures adopted under sections (c) and (d) of this rule to determine whether they are adequate and up-to-date and shall ensure that the dealer is in compliance with this rule.]

(f) Supervisory Control System

(i) Each dealer shall designate one or more principals who shall establish, maintain, and enforce a system of supervisory control policies and procedures that (A) test and verify that the dealer’s supervisory procedures are reasonably designed with respect to the municipal securities activities of the dealer and its registered representatives and associated persons, to achieve compliance with applicable rules and (B) create additional or amend supervisory procedures where the need is identified by such testing and verification. The designated principal or principals must submit to the dealer’s senior management no less than annually a report detailing each dealer’s system of supervisory controls, the summary of the test results and significant identified exceptions, and any additional or amended supervisory procedures created in response to the test results.

(ii) The establishment, maintenance, and enforcement of written supervisory control policies and procedures pursuant to paragraph (f)(i) shall include:

(A) procedures that are reasonably designed to review and supervise the customer account activity conducted by the dealer’s branch office managers, sales managers, regional or district sales managers, or any person performing a similar supervisory function.

(1) General Supervisory Requirement.  A person who is either senior to, or otherwise independent of, the producing manager must perform such supervisory reviews. For purposes of this rule, an "otherwise independent" person: may not report either directly or indirectly to the producing manager under review; must be situated in an office other than the office of the producing manager; must not otherwise have supervisory responsibility over the activity being reviewed (including not being directly compensated based in whole or in part on the revenues accruing for those activities); and must alternate such review responsibility with another qualified person every two years or less.

(2) “Limited Size and Resources” Exception.  If a dealer is so limited in size and resources that there is no qualified person senior to, or otherwise independent of, the producing manager to conduct the reviews pursuant to (1) above (e.g., a dealer has only one office or an insufficient number of qualified personnel who can conduct reviews on a two-year rotation), the reviews may be conducted by a principal who is sufficiently knowledgeable of the dealer's supervisory control procedures, provided that the reviews are in compliance with (1) to the extent practicable.

(3) Notification Requirement.  If a dealer determines that it must rely on the "limited size and resources" exception set forth in (2) above to conduct any of its producing managers' supervisory reviews, the dealer must notify the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer through an electronic process (or any other process prescribed by such association or agency) within 30 days of the date on which the dealer first relies on the exception, and annually thereafter.  If a dealer subsequently determines that it no longer needs to rely on the exception to conduct any of its producing managers’ supervisory reviews, the dealer must, within 30 days of ceasing to rely on the exception, notify the registered securities association with respect to a dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency with respect to any other dealer by using the electronic process or any other process prescribed by such association or agency.

(4) Documentation Requirement.  A dealer relying on (2) above must document in its supervisory control procedures the factors used to determine that complete compliance with all of the provisions of (1) is not possible and that the required supervisory systems and procedures in place with respect to any producing manager comply with the provisions of (1) above to the extent practicable.

(B) procedures that are reasonably designed to review and monitor the following activities:

(1) all transmittals of funds (e.g., wires or checks, etc.) or securities from customers to third party accounts (i.e., a transmittal that would result in a change of beneficial ownership); from customer accounts to outside entities (e.g., banks, investment companies, etc.); from customer accounts to locations other than a customer's primary residence (e.g., post office box, "in care of" accounts, alternate address, etc.); and between customers and registered representatives, including the hand-delivery of checks;

(2) customer changes of address and the validation of such changes of address; and

(3) customer changes of investment objectives and the validation of such changes of investment objectives.

The policies and procedures established pursuant to paragraph (f)(ii)(B) must include a means or method of customer confirmation, notification, or follow-up that can be documented. If a dealer does not engage in all of the activities enumerated above, the dealer must identify those activities in which it does not engage in its written supervisory control policies and procedures and document in those policies and procedures that additional supervisory policies and procedures for such activities must be in place before the dealer can engage in them; and

(C) procedures that are reasonably designed to provide heightened supervision over the activities of each producing manager who is responsible for generating 20% or more of the revenue of the business units supervised by the producing manager's supervisor. For the purposes of this subsection only, the term "heightened supervision" shall mean those supervisory procedures that evidence supervisory activities that are designed to avoid conflicts of interest that serve to undermine complete and effective supervision because of the economic, commercial, or financial interests that the supervisor holds in the associated persons and businesses being supervised. In addition, for the purpose of this section only, when calculating the 20% threshold, all of the revenue generated by or credited to the producing manager or the producing manager's office shall be attributed as revenue generated by the business units supervised by the producing manager's supervisor irrespective of a dealer's internal allocation of such revenue. A dealer must calculate the 20% threshold on a rolling, twelve-month basis. 

(g) Definitions

(i) "Office of Supervisory Jurisdiction" means any office of a dealer at which any one or more of the following functions take place:

(A) order execution and/or market making;

(B) structuring of public offerings or private placements;

(C) maintaining custody of customers' funds and/or securities;

(D) final acceptance (approval) of new accounts on behalf of the dealer;

(E) review and endorsement of customer orders, pursuant to paragraph (e) above;

(F) final approval of advertising or sales literature for use by persons associated with the dealer, pursuant to Rule G-21(f); or

(G) responsibility for supervising the activities of persons associated with the dealer at one or more other branch offices of the dealer.

(ii)(A) A "branch office" is any location where one or more associated persons of a dealer regularly conducts the business of effecting any transactions in, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any municipal security, or is held out as such, excluding:

(1) Any location that is established solely for customer service and/or back office type functions where no sales activities are conducted and that is not held out to the public as a branch office;

(2) Any location that is the associated person's primary residence; provided that

a. Only one associated person, or multiple associated persons who reside at that location and are dealers of the same immediate family, conduct business at the location;

b. The location is not held out to the public as an office and the associated person does not meet with customers at the location;

c. Neither customer funds nor securities are handled at that location;

d. The associated person is assigned to a designated branch office, and such designated branch office is reflected on all business cards, stationery, advertisements and other communications to the public by such associated person;

e. The associated person's correspondence and communications with the public are subject to the dealer's supervision in accordance with this rule;

f. Electronic communications (e.g., e-mail) are made through the dealer's electronic system;

g. All orders are entered through the designated branch office or an electronic system established by the dealer that is reviewable at the branch office;

h. Written supervisory procedures pertaining to supervision of sales activities conducted at the residence are maintained by the dealer; and

i. A list of the residence locations is maintained by the dealer;

(3) Any location, other than a primary residence, that is used for municipal securities business for less than 30 business days in any one calendar year, provided the dealer complies with the provisions of paragraph (A)(2)(ii)a. through h. above;

(4) Any office of convenience, where associated persons occasionally and exclusively by appointment meet with customers, which is not held out to the public as an office.  Where such office of convenience is located on bank premises, signage necessary to comply with applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations and applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE, other self-regulatory organizations, and securities and banking regulators may be displayed and shall not be deemed “holding out” for the purposes of this section;

(5) Any location that is used primarily to engage in non-securities activities and from which the associated person(s) effects no more than 25 securities transactions in any one calendar year; provided that any advertisement or sales literature identifying such location also sets forth the address and telephone number of the location from which the associated person(s) conducting business at the non-branch locations are directly supervised;

(6) The Floor of a registered national securities exchange where a dealer conducts a direct access business with public customers; or

(7) A temporary location established in response to the implementation of a business continuity plan.

(B) Notwithstanding the exclusions in paragraph (2)(A), any location that is responsible for supervising the activities of persons associated with the dealer at one or more non-branch locations of the dealer is considered to be a branch office.

(C) The term "business day" as used (2)(A) shall not include any partial business day provided that the associated person spends at least four hours on such business day at his or her designated branch office during the hours that such office is normally open for business.

(iii) The term “appropriate regulatory agency” means the appropriate regulatory agency as defined in Section 3(a)(34) of the Act.

[3] The draft amendments to Rule G-27 define an “Office of Supervisory Jurisdiction” as any office of a dealer at which any one or more of the following functions take place:

(A) order execution and/or market making;
(B) structuring of public offerings or private placements;
(C) maintaining custody of customers’ funds and/or securities;
(D) final acceptance (approval) of new accounts on behalf of the dealer;
(E) review and endorsement of customer orders;
(F) final approval of advertising or sales literature for use by persons associated with the dealer; or
(G) responsibility for supervising the activities of persons associated with the dealer at one or more other branch offices of the dealer.

[4] This provision was developed by the NASD to respond to two issues. First, it responds to concerns regarding the need for heightened supervision of certain registered representatives with troubled regulatory and compliance records. Second, it addresses the particular problems that occur when a firm hires a large number of individuals who formerly worked at a firm that has been expelled or has had its registration revoked and where they were inadequately supervised and trained.